Massacre in Virginia: For Rampage Killers, Familiar Descriptions, 'Troubled,' 'Loner,' but No Profile

18 April 2007

Reflecting on the Virginia Tech killings perpetrated by university student Seung-Hui Cho, in what amounted to the largest school shooting in US history, Dr. Jerrold Post contrasted suicide mass killers like Mr. Cho with suicide bombers. Suicide bombers are chosen for their mental stability, while rampage killers are typically mentally troubled, said Post, Chief Scientist in Political Psychology at the Center for Advanced Defense Studies (CADS). Suicide bombers are usually directed by a commander, and believe in a fundamental sense they are acting to save the world, he added in a New York Times interview.

###

Dr. Jerrold Post is Chief Scientist in Political Psychology at the Center for Advanced Defense Studies (CADS), a non-profit, non-governmental national security group that applies the intent-centric paradigm to promote research, innovation and education in the fields of information sciences, cognitive studies and information security.

Click here to download The New York Times article

Click here to be added to the CADS mailing list

Winter Issue of Defense Concepts Available

Washington, DC, January 2010

The Center for Advanced Defense Studies (CADS) is pleased to announce the publication of the Winter issue of Defense Concepts, our academic journal, featuring insightful writing on the most significant international trends and events of our times. Through this publication, CADS disseminates research in the fields of information science, cognitive studies, military science, counterterrorism, and other topics pertaining to global security to our partners in academia, government and industry. As an interdisciplinary publication that incorporates articles by authors with diverse backgrounds and experiences, Defense Concepts provides scholars, scientists, executives, and government officials with a forum for a serious discussion of questions of international interest. The articles featured in this journal include analyses of continuously evolving threats, assessments of government policies and programs, and reflections on national strategy. These interpretations contribute to lively debate regarding global security and reflect CADS’ commitment to Innovation for Peace.